Analysis of U.S. Tariff Actions on China in April 2025: Assessment of Reciprocal Tariffs, Exemptions, and Impact on Technology Products
- https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-06063.pdf
- https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/amendment-to-recipricol-tariffs-and-updated-duties-as-applied-to-low-value-imports-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china/
- https://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USDHSCBP-3db9e55?wgt_ref=USDHSCBP_WIDGET_2
Then, conduct in-depth research on Trump's tariff policies to date. Specifically, how many products have been exempted from reciprocal tariffs, and what are the tariff rates? What are the tariff rates, in particular, for smartphones, electronics, and semiconductors exported from China?")
I. Introduction
In early April 2025, the U.S. government undertook a series of rapid and far-reaching tariff actions, significantly altering the landscape of trade relations with major trading partners, particularly the People's Republic of China (PRC). Citing long-standing trade deficits and alleged "unfair" trade practices, these actions introduced a new "Reciprocal Tariff" mechanism and implemented multiple rounds of swift escalations targeting China. This report aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the specific content of these tariff actions, their internal consistency, the exemption status for specific products (especially technology products), and to assess the actual total tariff burden on smartphones, semiconductors, and other electronic products imported from China after these measures are superimposed on existing tariffs (such as Section 301 tariffs and fentanyl-related tariffs based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)).
II. Analysis of April 2025 Tariff Actions: Introduction and Escalation of Reciprocal Tariffs
In early April 2025, the U.S. government, through a series of executive orders, rapidly established and adjusted a new tariff framework centered on the concept of "Reciprocal Tariffs," primarily targeting China.
A. Executive Order 14257: Laying the Foundation for Reciprocal Tariffs (April 2, 2025)
Citing the "unusual and extraordinary threat" posed to national security and the economy by the United States' large and persistent annual goods trade deficits, this executive order declared a national emergency.1 Its core policy was to rebalance global trade flows by imposing additional ad valorem duties on nearly all imports from all trading partners.1
Base Rate: The order stipulated a general 10% additional ad valorem duty on imports from all trading partners (unless otherwise specified), effective April 5, 2025.1
Country-Specific Rates: Annex I of the order listed specific trading partners, including China, which would be subject to higher, specific rates later (April 9). China (including Hong Kong and Macau Special Administrative Regions) was designated to face a 34% additional ad valorem duty, applicable to goods entering for U.S. consumption on or after April 9, 2025, provided they were not already in transit.1
Initial Exemptions: Annex II listed initial exemptions from this reciprocal tariff, including humanitarian aid, certain steel and aluminum products, specific automobiles and parts, as well as copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber, certain critical minerals, and energy products.1 Notably, the exemption for "semiconductors" here was broadly defined, setting the stage for later clarifications.
Calculation Basis: The tariff applied to the non-U.S. content of the subject article, provided at least 20% of its value originated in the U.S..1
This order marked the U.S. attempt to use tariffs as leverage, in a universal yet differentiated manner, to compel trading partners to adjust their trade policies towards more "reciprocal" trade relations.
B. Amendment Targeting China: First Escalation (April 8, 2025)
Shortly after EO 14257 was issued, China announced it would impose 34% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods.2 In response, the U.S. President signed an amendment targeting China on April 8 (later numbered as Executive Order 14259).2
Reciprocal Tariff Rate Increase: The reciprocal tariff rate applicable to goods from China (including HK and Macau) was significantly increased from the planned 34% to 84%, with the effective date remaining April 9, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. EDT.2
Low-Value Import (De Minimis) Tariff Adjustment: Concurrently, this amendment also raised the tariffs on low-value imports (typically under $800) from China under a separate executive order (EO 14256): the ad valorem rate increased from 30% to 90%; the minimum per-item fee for postal parcels was also increased in stages, from $25 to $75 effective May 2, and further to $150 effective June 1.2 This aimed to prevent evasion of high tariffs through small parcels.
This amendment demonstrated a swift and forceful U.S. reaction to China's retaliation, significantly enhancing the punitive nature of the reciprocal tariffs and simultaneously tightening the duty-free channel for small-value trade.
C. Further Amendment: Second Escalation and Suspension for Other Countries (April 9, 2025)
China again announced retaliation against the 84% tariff, raising its tariffs on U.S. goods to 84%.3 The U.S. immediately issued further modifications to the reciprocal tariffs on April 9.3
China Tariff Increased Again: The reciprocal tariff rate applicable to goods from China (including HK and Macau) surged further from 84% to 125%, effective April 10, 2025, at 12:01 a.m. EDT.3
Low-Value Import Tariff Increased Again: The ad valorem rate for low-value goods from China increased to 120%; the minimum per-item fee for postal parcels also increased accordingly, to $100 effective May 2, and $200 effective June 1 (some sources indicate $150 then $200, the $100/$200 figures are used here).3
Suspension for Other Annex I Countries: In contrast to the harsh measures against China, this amendment announced that the country-specific reciprocal tariff rates scheduled to take effect on April 9 for other trading partners listed in Annex I (excluding China) were suspended for 90 days (from April 10 to July 9). During this suspension period, imports from these countries would only be subject to the initial 10% baseline reciprocal tariff.3
This amendment revealed a clear dual strategy: applying maximum pressure on China while granting other major trading partners a buffer period, possibly to divide opponents or create negotiating space.
D. Consistency Assessment
Taken together, these three documents (EO 14257, April 8 Amendment, April 9 Amendment) exhibit a high degree of dynamic consistency regarding tariff policy towards China. They collectively construct a narrative of gradual escalation: the U.S. first established a tariff framework based on the "reciprocity" principle, then, following China's retaliatory measures, rapidly and disproportionately raised tariff barriers against China, while simultaneously adjusting its strategy towards other countries. Although the specific rates changed dramatically within days, the underlying logic—using tariffs as a tool to respond to trade deficits and the actions of trading partners (especially China's retaliation)—remained consistent throughout.1
III. Reciprocal Tariff Exemptions: Focus on Technology Products
Despite the generally applicable nature of the reciprocal tariffs, the executive orders and subsequent clarifications stipulated important exemptions, particularly in the technology sector.
A. Initial Exemptions (EO 14257 Annex II)
Annex II of Executive Order 14257 initially listed several exempt categories, including humanitarian goods, steel, aluminum, and automotive products already subject to Section 232 tariffs, etc. Notably, Annex II explicitly mentioned "semiconductors" as an exempt item.1 However, the specific scope covered by this term was initially unclear.
B. Explicit Exemption of Key Technology Products (April 11 Presidential Memorandum / CBP Guidance)
Given the drastic increase in the reciprocal tariff rate for China (reaching 125%) and the potential massive economic disruption due to the ambiguity of the term "semiconductors" in the initial exemptions, the U.S. government acted swiftly to provide clarification. On April 11, 2025, the President issued a memorandum, followed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) guidance CSMS # 64724565, which explicitly defined the scope of goods not subject to reciprocal tariffs.7
Exemption Mechanism: For goods falling within the scope of the exemption, importers were instructed to use the secondary HTSUS classification number 9903.01.32 for declaration, thereby exempting them from the reciprocal tariff HTSUS numbers applicable to Chinese goods (e.g., 9903.01.63, later adjusted for the 125% rate) or other countries' reciprocal tariff numbers.7
Exempted HTS Codes and Products: According to CBP guidance and related analyses, products under the following HTS codes were explicitly exempted from reciprocal tariffs 7:
Table 1: HTS Codes Exempted from April 2025 Reciprocal Tariffs per Presidential Memo/CBP Guidance
Significance of Exemptions: This exemption list covers an extremely broad and critical range of technology products, including not only semiconductor components (diodes, transistors, ICs) but also final consumer goods like smartphones and computers, as well as network equipment, storage devices, displays, and semiconductor manufacturing equipment.7 Against the backdrop of the reciprocal tariff rate on China soaring to 125%, this explicit exemption action is particularly significant. It indicates that policymakers recognized that imposing such prohibitively high punitive tariffs on these widely used core technology products would cause devastating and unacceptable economic chaos for U.S. consumers, business IT infrastructure, and even domestic industry (by exempting manufacturing equipment). Therefore, despite the overall pressure on China, a "red line" was drawn for these key technology areas regarding the use of this specific reciprocal tariff tool, showing a strategic consideration to avoid immediately paralyzing the technology ecosystem.
IV. Tariff Stacking Effect: Interaction with Other Existing Tariffs
Understanding the total tariff burden on goods imported from China requires considering that reciprocal tariffs are imposed on top of other pre-existing tariffs. The most significant among these are the Section 301 tariffs implemented since 2018 and the recent tariffs imposed under IEEPA related to fentanyl precursors.
A. Status and Impact of Section 301 Tariffs
Originating from the USTR investigation into China's practices related to technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation, Section 301 tariffs have imposed additional duties ranging from 7.5% to 25% on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Chinese goods since 2018.12 These tariffs remain in effect after the implementation of the new reciprocal tariffs in April 2025 and operate independently.6
Four-Year Review and Rate Increases: In 2024, USTR completed its statutory four-year review of the Section 301 tariffs, concluding that the tariffs should be maintained and increased in several strategic sectors.12 These increases are being phased in, taking effect in September 2024, January 2025, and January 2026.16
Key Sector Rate Changes: Key changes relevant to this report include 16:
Semiconductors: The 25% rate applied to certain semiconductor products under Lists 1 and 2 (parts of HTS 8541, 8542) is scheduled to increase to 50% on January 1, 2025.
Solar cells: Increased from 25% to 50% (September 2024).
Electric vehicles: Increased from 25% to 100% (September 2024).
Lithium-ion batteries (EV and non-EV): Increased from 7.5% to 25% (September 2024 and January 2026, respectively).
Other: Steel and aluminum products, medical supplies (masks, gloves, syringes), ship-to-shore cranes, critical minerals, permanent magnets, etc., also face tariff increases or new tariffs.
Table 2: Overview of U.S. Section 301 Tariff Rate Changes on Select Chinese Imports
*(Source: [16])*
Proposed New Tariffs: USTR also announced plans to impose new Section 301 tariffs (potentially 25% or 50%) on products like polysilicon, wafers, and tungsten products, which currently face low or no Section 301 tariffs, subject to further public comment procedures.16
Tariff Exclusions: While exclusion processes existed historically, most exclusions had expired by the end of 2024. USTR only extended the exclusion period for 164 products until May 31, 2025.12 Additionally, USTR granted exclusions for specific solar manufacturing equipment and is considering a new exclusion process for certain machinery under HTS Chapters 84 and 85.14 Overall, the scope of exclusions is extremely limited, indicating a policy preference for maintaining tariff pressure, even if it imposes costs on U.S. importers and consumers.20
Dual-Track Strategy for Semiconductors: Exempting semiconductor products from the potentially catastrophic 125% reciprocal tariff 7 while simultaneously planning to increase their Section 301 tariff from 25% to 50% 16 reveals a carefully calibrated strategy. Policymakers seem to be using different legal tools to apply different types of pressure: avoiding the disastrous, immediate supply chain shock of reciprocal tariffs, but using the more targeted Section 301 mechanism—aimed at addressing long-term structural issues like technology transfer and industrial subsidies—to maintain and increase pressure on China's semiconductor industry.
B. IEEPA Fentanyl-Related Tariffs
Beyond reciprocal and Section 301 tariffs, there is another significant layer of duties. Based on the national emergency declared to combat the inflow of fentanyl and its precursors into the U.S., the government, under IEEPA authority, imposed an additional 10% ad valorem duty on all imports from China (and Hong Kong) in February 2025, increasing the rate to 20% in March 2025.12
Universal Application and Stacking: This 20% tariff applies to nearly all goods imported from China and is stacked on top of Normal Trade Relations (NTR) duties, Section 301 tariffs, and (if applicable and not exempted) reciprocal tariffs.6 Unless there are specific exemptions under this IEEPA order (currently no indication for tech products), all goods from China incur this additional 20% cost.
C. Cumulative Tariff Calculation Method
Therefore, to calculate the total additional tariff payable on an item imported from China, one needs to sum the various layers:
Total Additional Tariff = NTR Base Rate (if non-zero) + Section 301 Tariff (if applicable) + IEEPA Fentanyl Tariff (20%) + Reciprocal Tariff (if applicable and not exempt, then 125%)
Key Factor: Reciprocal Tariff Exemption: For technology products under the HTS codes listed in Table 1, the reciprocal tariff component is 0%.7
Impact of Extremely High Burden: For Chinese goods not exempted from reciprocal tariffs, the cumulative additional tariff becomes extremely high. For example, an item subject to a 25% Section 301 tariff, the 20% fentanyl tariff, and the 125% reciprocal tariff would face a total additional tariff of 170% (25% + 20% + 125%), plus any applicable NTR base rate. Such high rates (often exceeding 150%) 6 have a strong trade-restrictive effect, likely intended to effectively block imports of these specific goods from China, acting more like a selective trade barrier than mere economic adjustment.
V. Effective Tariff Rates for Key Chinese Technology Imports
Based on the analysis above, we can estimate the total additional tariff rates faced by specific Chinese technology products of interest as of mid-April 2025. The following calculations assume a zero NTR base rate to clearly illustrate the additional tariff stacking.
A. Smartphones (e.g., HTS 8517.13.00)
Reciprocal Tariff Status: Exempt (HTS 8517.13.00 is on the Table 1 exemption list).7 Rate = 0%.
Section 301 Status: Generally not applicable. Consumer electronics like smartphones were mostly on List 4B (tariffs not implemented) or List 4A (rate later reduced to 7.5% and potential exclusions). Assumed rate = 0% for simplicity.
IEEPA Fentanyl Tariff: Applicable.12 Rate = 20%.
Total Additional Tariff ≈ 0% + 0% + 20% = 20%
B. Semiconductors (e.g., HTS 8541, 8542)
Reciprocal Tariff Status: Exempt (HTS 8541., 8542. are on the Table 1 exemption list).7 Rate = 0%.
Section 301 Status: Applicable (primarily on Lists 1 and 2).18
Current rate = 25%.
Planned increase to 50% effective January 1, 2025.16
IEEPA Fentanyl Tariff: Applicable.12 Rate = 20%.
Total Additional Tariff (Current) ≈ 0% + 25% + 20% = 45%
Total Additional Tariff (From Jan 1, 2025) ≈ 0% + 50% + 20% = 70%
C. Other Electronic Products
Computers (e.g., HTS 8471)
Reciprocal Tariff Status: Exempt (HTS 8471 is on the Table 1 exemption list).7 Rate = 0%.
Section 301 Status: Generally not applicable (same reasoning as smartphones). Assumed rate = 0%.
IEEPA Fentanyl Tariff: Applicable.12 Rate = 20%.
Total Additional Tariff ≈ 0% + 0% + 20% = 20%
Computer Parts (e.g., HTS 8473.30)
Reciprocal Tariff Status: Exempt (HTS 8473.30 is on the Table 1 exemption list).7 Rate = 0%.
Section 301 Status: Potentially applicable. Many computer parts are on List 3, subject to a 25% tariff.12 Specific parts need checking for exclusions. Assumed rate = 25% for illustration.
IEEPA Fentanyl Tariff: Applicable.12 Rate = 20%.
Total Additional Tariff (Example) ≈ 0% + 25% + 20% = 45%
Table 3: Estimated Total Effective Additional Tariff Rates for Select Chinese Technology Imports (as of mid-April 2025)
This table clearly shows that while key technology products like smartphones, computers, and semiconductors are exempt from the catastrophic 125% reciprocal tariff, they still face significant cumulative burdens from Section 301 tariffs (especially semiconductors, with rates set to double) and the IEEPA fentanyl tariff.
VI. Conclusion and Strategic Considerations
The series of U.S. tariff actions in April 2025 marks a significant intensification and complexification of trade policy towards China. Key conclusions and implications include:
Multi-Layered Tariff Structure: The U.S. now employs a multi-layered, stacked tariff system against Chinese imports, comprising NTR base rates, Section 301 tariffs, IEEPA fentanyl tariffs (20%), and the new reciprocal tariffs (up to 125% for China, with specific exemptions).
Rapid Escalation and Differentiation Towards China: The reciprocal tariff mechanism saw two rapid and drastic rate hikes targeting China (34% -> 84% -> 125%), while the highest rates for other major trading partners were suspended, indicating a strategy of focused pressure on China and potential differentiation among other nations.
Strategic Exemption of Key Tech Products: Despite imposing extremely high reciprocal tariffs on China, the government explicitly excluded a range of critical technology products—smartphones, computers, semiconductors, and their manufacturing equipment—from the 125% rate via subsequent clarification. This reflects a pragmatic consideration to avoid immediate, devastating impacts on the domestic economy and tech ecosystem, while retaining the ability to apply long-term pressure through other mechanisms (like raising Section 301 tariffs on semiconductors).
Actual Tariff Burden on Tech Products: Although spared the highest reciprocal tariff, smartphones and computers imported from China still face at least a 20% additional tariff (mainly from the IEEPA fentanyl duty). Semiconductor products face a higher total additional tariff (currently 45%, rising to 70% in 2025), primarily due to the combination of Section 301 and IEEPA fentanyl tariffs.
Tightening of Low-Value Channel: Imposing up to 120% ad valorem duties or high per-item fees on low-value (de minimis) imports from China effectively eliminates the possibility for Chinese goods to utilize this channel for duty-free or low-duty trade.
High Complexity and Uncertainty: The current tariff environment is extremely complex and rapidly evolving. Businesses need to precisely identify their products' HTS codes to determine reciprocal tariff exemption status and simultaneously track and calculate tariff layers stemming from multiple legal bases. Ongoing USTR reviews of Section 301 tariffs, the status of exclusions, and the policy direction for other countries' reciprocal tariffs after the 90-day suspension period add further uncertainty.
Key Impacts and Considerations for Businesses:
Accurate HTS Classification is Crucial: Precise product classification is fundamental for determining reciprocal tariff exemption status and calculating the overall tariff burden.
Multi-Dimensional Tariff Tracking: Companies must establish mechanisms to monitor and account for the applicability of NTR rates, Section 301 tariffs, IEEPA fentanyl tariffs, and reciprocal tariffs simultaneously.
Significant Cost Increases: Costs for importing from China have generally risen, particularly for goods not exempted from reciprocal tariffs or subject to high Section 301 duties.
Supply Chain Risk Assessment and Diversification: For non-exempt goods facing extremely high cumulative tariffs (especially those including the 125% reciprocal tariff), sourcing from China may become unviable, forcing companies to accelerate supply chain diversification or relocation.
Continuous Monitoring of Policy Dynamics: Closely watch USTR developments regarding Section 301 exclusions, proposed new tariffs (e.g., polysilicon, wafers), and the policy trajectory for other countries' reciprocal tariffs after the 90-day suspension ends.
In conclusion, the April 2025 tariff actions represent a major escalation in the U.S. use of multiple trade tools to exert unprecedented pressure on China. While the exemption of key technology products from the highest reciprocal tariffs provides some buffer, the overall complexity and increased cost of the tariff environment demand more cautious risk assessment and strategic adjustments from affected businesses.
引用的著作
public-inspection.federalregister.gov, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-06063.pdf
Amendment to Reciprocal Tariffs and Updated Duties as Applied to Low-Value Imports from the People's Republic of China - The White House, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/amendment-to-recipricol-tariffs-and-updated-duties-as-applied-to-low-value-imports-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china/
Modifying Reciprocal Tariff Rates to Reflect Trading Partner Retaliation and Alignment, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/modifying-reciprocal-tariff-rates-to-reflect-trading-partner-retaliation-and-alignment/
US Modifies Reciprocal Tariff Rates - Troutman Pepper Locke, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.troutman.com/insights/us-modifies-reciprocal-tariff-rates.html
US suspends President Trump's Reciprocal Tariff Policy for 90 days, except for China, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://globaltaxnews.ey.com/news/2025-0868-us-suspends-president-trumps-reciprocal-tariff-policy-for-90-days-except-for-china
“Liberation Day”– Trump Announces Reciprocal Tariffs, Ends De Minimis Treatment for China - Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.bhfs.com/insights/alerts-articles/2025/-liberation-day-trump-announces-reciprocal-tariffs-ends-de-minimis-treatment-for-china
CSMS # 64724565 - UPDATED GUIDANCE – Reciprocal Tariff ..., Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USDHSCBP-3db9e55?wgt_ref=USDHSCBP_WIDGET_2
White House Releases List of Products Not Subject to Reciprocal Tariffs | SmarTrade, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.thompsonhinesmartrade.com/2025/04/white-house-releases-list-of-products-not-subject-to-reciprocal-tariffs/
Apple, Nvidia, Dell, and Others Get a Tariffs Exemption Under New Rules | Hacker News, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43664665
Harmonized Tariff Schedule - USITC, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://hts.usitc.gov/
8542.32 - Harmonized Tariff Schedule - USITC, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://hts.usitc.gov/search?query=8542
A Guide to China's Section 301 Tariffs (2025 Update) - USA Customs Clearance, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://usacustomsclearance.com/process/section-301-tariffs-a-comprehensive-guide/
China Section 301-Tariff Actions and Exclusion Process - U.S. Trade Representative, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/enforcement/section-301-investigations/tariff-actions
Section 301 Tariffs on China | Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.strtrade.com/trade-news-resources/tariff-actions-resources/section-301-tariffs-on-china
Immediate Impacts, Risks, and Uncertain Future of President Trump's Unprecedented Worldwide Tariffs - Gibson Dunn, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.gibsondunn.com/immediate-impacts-risks-and-uncertain-future-of-president-trumps-unprecedented-worldwide-tariffs/
United States Finalizes Section 301 Tariff Increases on Imports from China, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/united-states-finalizes-section-301-tariff-increases-imports-china
FOUR-YEAR REVIEW OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN THE SECTION 301 INVESTIGATION: CHINA'S ACTS, POLICIES, AND PRACTICES RELATED TO TECHNOLOG, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/USTR%20Report%20Four%20Year%20Review%20of%20China%20Tech%20Transfer%20Section%20301.pdf
Section 301 Tariff FAQ | TTI, Inc., Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.tti.com/content/ttiinc/en/help-center/section-301-tariff-faq.html
Tariff News | Section 301 Tariffs U.S. Timeline | Chinese Tariffs - Shapiro, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.shapiro.com/tariffs/tariff-news/
Request for Comments on the Possible Reinstatement of Certain Exclusions in the Section 301 Investigation of China's Acts, Policies, and - Semiconductor Industry Association, Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://www.semiconductors.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/SIA-Section-301-Product-Exclusions-Reinstatement-Request-FINAL-12011.pdf
June 28, 2024 ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION TO https://www.regulations.gov Ambassador Katherine Tai U.S. Trade Representative Office of - Consumer Technology Association (CTA), Search date：4月 13, 2025， https://cdn.cta.tech/cta/media/media/pdfs/cta-final-comments-to-ustr-on-china-section-301-tariff-rate-increases-and-exclusion-process-20240628.pdf
留言
張貼留言